Search found 1417 matches
- Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:33 am
- Forum: pre-processing
- Topic: How to simulate the precipitated phase
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4
Re: How to simulate the precipitated phase
Dear bachelor, Welcome to the MICRESS Forum! Morphology can have different reasons: It can be due to interface instability (e.g. dendrites or eutectics), to interface anisotropy (e.g. faceted structures), or also to stress effects. If you say your precipitates are round or squared this reminds me to...
- Mon Jun 27, 2022 8:41 pm
- Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
- Topic: ferritic phase transformation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 20
Re: ferritic phase transformation
Hi lv, I think you can change the behavior by adjusting interfacial energy parameters: If σ(α-α) is chosen smaller than σ(α-γ), there should be wetting between the ferrite precipitates instead of rejection. A factor of 2 is sufficient to achieve full wetting, if the transformation is fully diffusion...
- Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:44 pm
- Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
- Topic: ferritic phase transformation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 20
Re: ferritic phase transformation
Dear lv,
Did not get your question, can you please explain?
Bernd
Did not get your question, can you please explain?
Bernd
- Tue Jun 14, 2022 11:53 pm
- Forum: solidification
- Topic: Stress evolution during solidification
- Replies: 1
- Views: 73
Re: Stress evolution during solidification
Hi Ghavam,
I think the problem could be that the thermal expansion coefficients which you are using are 2-3 orders of magnitude too high. It is length and not volume expansion which is required here.
Bernd
I think the problem could be that the thermal expansion coefficients which you are using are 2-3 orders of magnitude too high. It is length and not volume expansion which is required here.
Bernd
- Thu Jun 09, 2022 12:16 pm
- Forum: recrystallisation/grain growth
- Topic: Recrystallization
- Replies: 17
- Views: 568
Re: Recrystallization
Dear Lv,
Your driving file looks ok. The only detail which I do not understand is why you have two different seed types for ferrite on austenite, where one creates reX-energy and the other doesn't...
Bernd
Your driving file looks ok. The only detail which I do not understand is why you have two different seed types for ferrite on austenite, where one creates reX-energy and the other doesn't...
Bernd
- Wed Jun 08, 2022 8:13 pm
- Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
- Topic: Partition-no-partition transition temperature during pearlite-to-austenite transformation
- Replies: 17
- Views: 501
Re: Partition-no-partition transition temperature during pearlite-to-austenite transformation
<t>Dear Pina,<br/> <br/> Meanwhile, I intensively checked your problem with the "paratq" model, and I came to the conclusion that there is a fundamental problem: This model uses the tqgdf2 function of the Thermo-Calc TQ-interface which also allows for calculation of para-equilibrium. However, this m...
- Tue Jun 07, 2022 7:42 pm
- Forum: recrystallisation/grain growth
- Topic: Recrystallization
- Replies: 17
- Views: 568
Re: Recrystallization
Dear Lv, Yes, you can easily omit step 2 in your approach and directly introduce recrystallisation energy using seed type 1. But using seed type 2 instead is more straightforward and also more flexible: Imagine that after recrystallisation you would like to apply another deformation and recrystallis...
- Fri Jun 03, 2022 7:42 pm
- Forum: solidification
- Topic: Solidification for LPBF-AlMg alloys
- Replies: 5
- Views: 282
Re: Solidification for LPBF-AlMg alloys
Hi Desai, No, it has nothing to do with diffusion data, the error occurred while calculating volumetric data. I tried to reproduce the error, but could not. Instead, there are thousands of other error for interface 0/4 and also for 0/2. My impression is that the basic problem is a too coarse grid re...
- Tue May 31, 2022 5:16 pm
- Forum: recrystallisation/grain growth
- Topic: Recrystallization
- Replies: 17
- Views: 568
Re: Recrystallization
Dear lv, I am still not sure about how you want to design your recrystallisation model. By specifying "all_interfaces" in the phase input section for bcc, and by specifying the maximum value of reX-energies (1,0 J/cm3) as energy threshold for recrystallisation you have decided that deformed grains c...
- Tue May 31, 2022 4:45 pm
- Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
- Topic: Partition-no-partition transition temperature during pearlite-to-austenite transformation
- Replies: 17
- Views: 501
Re: Partition-no-partition transition temperature during pearlite-to-austenite transformation
Dear Pina, I still do not understand why you want to apply the higher Mn composition only to the lamellar region and not to the whole area of the colony - what is the reasoning behind? Apart from that, I found a problem in the linearisation parameter sets of fcc/cementite and bcc/cementite with para...