Search found 39 matches

by janin
Tue Nov 28, 2023 12:24 pm
Forum: solidification
Topic: Grain size versus cooling rate ?
Replies: 6
Views: 94706

Re: Grain size versus cooling rate ?

Hi Stéphane, You may perhaps find some answers in my presentation ‘Phase-Field Studies of the Interplay between Nucleation and Growth in Light Metal Alloys’ from March 2019 which you can find in ResearchGate https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332409294_Phase-Field_Studies_of_the_Interplay_betw...
by janin
Fri Nov 04, 2022 10:07 pm
Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
Topic: Pearlite-to-austenite transformation
Replies: 1
Views: 3983

Re: Pearlite-to-austenite transformation

Dear Pina, great to see you working on such interesting simulations! I couldn't run your simulation without the input structure, but I guess the critical point is that you defined austenite with tetragonal symmetry. This means, it can nucleate in two different variants with special orientation relat...
by janin
Thu Oct 06, 2022 3:07 pm
Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
Topic: nucleation density
Replies: 2
Views: 5684

Re: nucleation density

Hi, as far as I understood you would like to evaluate the effective nucleation density from a simulation which has already been run, i.e. as post processing. In fact, there does not yet exist a direct output for the effective nucleation density, but in most cases you can evalutate it indirectly from...
by janin
Tue Aug 23, 2022 6:48 pm
Forum: post-processing
Topic: Changing orientation files to inverse pole figures
Replies: 4
Views: 11297

Re: Changing orientation files to inverse pole figures

Hi Moritz, I guess the most convenient way would be to combine the output files *.korn and *TabO. 1.) Extract the grain id for each cell within the domain from file.korn. 2.) Get the associated orientation from TabO. 3.) Create the pole figure with MatLab or the same tool you use for experimental da...
by janin
Mon Feb 07, 2022 4:35 pm
Forum: solidification
Topic: Curvature output (.Krum)
Replies: 1
Views: 4104

Re: Curvature output (.Krum)

Hi, In fact, two different ways of curvature evaluation are inplemented within Micress. A general advantage of the phase-field method is that the kinetic phase-field equation ( derived from the free energy functional) implicitely accounts for capillarity forces and profile readjustment. The numerica...
by janin
Wed Apr 14, 2021 7:20 pm
Forum: phase-field model
Topic: Multiphase field equation problem
Replies: 2
Views: 5762

Re: Multiphase field equation problem

Hi, To question1: Relaxation approach The MPF order parameters are linked by the unit sum constraint, i.e. each phase can only change its state in interaction with another phase. The given relaxation approach describes the evolution of the multiphase system towards a minimum of the free energy under...
by janin
Fri Dec 11, 2020 5:10 pm
Forum: solidification
Topic: Exactly same results from separate calculations
Replies: 1
Views: 2176

Re: Exactly same results from separate calculations

The amount of noise you specified in input file is locally added to the driving force. You can monitor the effect on the driving force in the *.driv output file. The values are given in units of J/cm3, if you devide them by the local entropy of fusion ( dSf ≈ 1 J/(cm3 K) you will get the extra under...
by janin
Thu Feb 27, 2020 4:09 pm
Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
Topic: Benchmark 2D single grain growth with square law
Replies: 2
Views: 3713

Re: Benchmark 2D single grain growth with square law

Hi Billy, first I like to comment that the shrinkage of a single round grain is one of the fundamental benchmarks provided in the Micress/example/benchmark folder under the name 'B007_1Grain_Shrinking_dri'. If you do not yet have this folder, you can download it from the Micress webpage https://micr...
by janin
Thu Jul 18, 2019 5:42 pm
Forum: solidification
Topic: Grain Input
Replies: 9
Views: 14679

Re: Grain Input

Good question! We still have to change it. When we first implemented random grain positioning, the critical radius did not yet exist. Later, when we introduced the critical radius, we couldn't agree how to define it in this case and postponed the problem. At present, the critical radius is still sim...
by janin
Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:16 pm
Forum: phase-field model
Topic: general Phase field equation for multi-obstacle potential
Replies: 4
Views: 8608

Re: general Phase field equation for multi-obstacle potential

1.) In this formulation, the mobility M_{\alpha \beta }^{\phi } denotes the physical mobility of an interface between two phases alpha and beta. We have writen the PF equation in a way that the parameters can easily be identified by matching to the Gibbs-Thomson equation. In the case of uncoupled gr...