Search found 11 matches
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 12:49 am
- Forum: trouble-shooting
- Topic: error (72) floating overflow
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10797
Re: error (72) floating overflow
Ralph, Thanks for sending the updated version. It appears to be running the input file without errors; however, there is a discrepancy between the simulation when ran on the parallel version of MICRESS 6.406 on linux and serial MICRESS 6.4 on Windows. The simulation appears to generate nucleation ev...
- Tue Mar 31, 2020 9:59 pm
- Forum: trouble-shooting
- Topic: error (72) floating overflow
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10797
Re: error (72) floating overflow
We've tried some more troubleshooting; here's where were at: The input file seems to run fine on our Windows machines (serial version of MICRESS 6.400) regardless of where/what OS the GES file was made. The input file always causes this same error on our linux HPC machine (parallel version of MICRES...
- Fri Mar 27, 2020 6:32 pm
- Forum: trouble-shooting
- Topic: error (72) floating overflow
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10797
Re: error (72) floating overflow
Thank you for looking into this, Bernd. I don't have any issues when I run this simulation on my desktop either, only when I use the parallel version. This particular simulation isn't exactly the concern as far as reducing simulation time via parallelization, but I have other simulations planned tha...
- Wed Mar 25, 2020 4:20 pm
- Forum: trouble-shooting
- Topic: error (72) floating overflow
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10797
Re: error (72) floating overflow
Thank you, Bernd for the advice. However, I've tried troubleshooting, and I have not been able to avoid the error. I checked the .diff output; the diffusion data had been updated for the two time-steps, however the value of the activation energy is zero for all elements/gradients. Also, this was the...
- Mon Mar 23, 2020 9:38 pm
- Forum: trouble-shooting
- Topic: error (72) floating overflow
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10797
error (72) floating overflow
Trying to run a simulation in the parallel version of MICRESS, but it doesn't make it past the first timestep. I don't know what this error is means or is referring to, so I'm not sure how to address it. Thanks for any help, Josh The following is the output and error upon starting the simulation: Re...
- Mon Mar 23, 2020 4:57 pm
- Forum: trouble-shooting
- Topic: Issues running simulations in parallel version
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8031
Re: Issues running simulations in parallel version
Thanks, Ralph. I'll take a look into getting 6.4 installed on our parallel machine. I'm intending to run simulations with simultaneous interstitial and substitutional solute partitioning. On my desktop, these these types of simulations would always slow down substantially after the nucleation of the...
- Mon Mar 23, 2020 2:45 pm
- Forum: trouble-shooting
- Topic: Issues running simulations in parallel version
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8031
Re: Issues running simulations in parallel version
Thanks for looking into this, Ralph. I use 6.4 on my desktop. I'm not sure why we have 6.2 for our parallel version. We just had our license updated so that we could run a linux version of MICRESS in parallel on a supercomputer. Is it possible we received the wrong version when we updated our licens...
- Fri Mar 20, 2020 3:37 pm
- Forum: trouble-shooting
- Topic: Issues running simulations in parallel version
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8031
Issues running simulations in parallel version
Hello, Recently I've started to run simulations on the parallel version of MICRESS in hopes to speed up the diffusion calculations and reduce overall simulation time. I am able to run and complete simulations, but they are not completing as expected. The first issue I have is that I apparently canno...
- Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:56 am
- Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
- Topic: Average Composition Conservation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2181
Average Composition Conservation
I'm simulating the nucleation and growth of a solid phase at grain boundaries in a solid matrix. The nucleating phase is expected to grow with an enriched composition that is partitioned from the matrix. I've noticed that the 'average concentration' of the partitioning component increases quite subs...
- Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:21 pm
- Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
- Topic: GES5 Issue
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2933
Re: GES5 Issue
That was an easy fix.
Thank you Deepu!
Thank you Deepu!