Hi Bernd
when you have set the parameters correctly, the D_GB physical out put in .diff file should be larger than the bulk diffusion coefficient value ?
Search found 215 matches
- Fri Aug 16, 2019 12:41 pm
- Forum: pre-processing
- Topic: How grain boundary diffusion works
- Replies: 18
- Views: 22806
- Fri Aug 09, 2019 1:15 pm
- Forum: solidification
- Topic: Data for further nucleation
- Replies: 64
- Views: 1343103
Re: Data for further nucleation
that would be OK, I think. we can give it a try
- Fri Aug 09, 2019 8:19 am
- Forum: solidification
- Topic: Data for further nucleation
- Replies: 64
- Views: 1343103
Re: Data for further nucleation
Ahh.. Thats a problem for me then.
Will it take few months to fix it?
Will it take few months to fix it?
- Thu Aug 08, 2019 3:30 pm
- Forum: solidification
- Topic: Data for further nucleation
- Replies: 64
- Views: 1343103
Re: Data for further nucleation
But since the boundary create between the solid phase and "switched-solid" phase will be a boundary with 0 degree misorientation. right?
So there will only be one grain boundary with misorienation. ?
So there will only be one grain boundary with misorienation. ?
- Thu Aug 08, 2019 1:24 pm
- Forum: solidification
- Topic: Data for further nucleation
- Replies: 64
- Views: 1343103
Re: Data for further nucleation
Hi Bernd, I will send the files to you. In my simulation I have two gamma seed types with two orientation. during the solidification it will create a grain boundary. Once after switching my intention is only to have one grain boundary. So I want to make remaining liquid orientations to be same orien...
- Thu Aug 08, 2019 8:30 am
- Forum: solidification
- Topic: Data for further nucleation
- Replies: 64
- Views: 1343103
Re: Data for further nucleation
Hi Bernd, It did not seems to work as expected. The switched grains still have the orientation of the liquid phase. then I tried changing the reference phase to solid phase (1) and substrate phase to liquid (0). There also switched grains have orientation of liquid phase. in both cases I used "paren...
- Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:41 pm
- Forum: solidification
- Topic: Data for further nucleation
- Replies: 64
- Views: 1343103
Re: Data for further nucleation
thanks Bernd. So is this the correct way of defining?
- Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:31 am
- Forum: solidification
- Topic: Data for further nucleation
- Replies: 64
- Views: 1343103
Re: Data for further nucleation
Hi Bernd, when you switch the remaining liquid in a simulation to a solid phase (using nucleation at interface of the solid phase) is there a way to set the orientation of the newly created solid phase to take the same orientation as the parent solid phase orientation? I do not want to create and in...
- Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:49 pm
- Forum: solidification
- Topic: Simulation of solidification of Gamma prime alloy during SLM process
- Replies: 43
- Views: 130815
Re: Simulation of solidification of Gamma prime alloy during SLM process
Hi Bernd, In my simulations I mainly get error to wards the end of the simulation where small amount of Liquid (>0.02%) is present. So I did some single phase equilibrium calculations with thermo-calc. considering the liquid composition. What I see is depend up on the temperature, major constituents...
- Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:09 am
- Forum: solidification
- Topic: Grain Input
- Replies: 9
- Views: 14634
Re: Grain Input
Thank Bernd,
Also is there a way to extract the coordinates of the grains that created when we use the option "random" for "type of grain positioning"
In addition to that, if you are reading grain properties from a file, how should this file looks like? (I am using angle_2d for orientation)
Also is there a way to extract the coordinates of the grains that created when we use the option "random" for "type of grain positioning"
In addition to that, if you are reading grain properties from a file, how should this file looks like? (I am using angle_2d for orientation)