Search found 1506 matches

by Bernd
Thu Oct 20, 2022 11:53 am
Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
Topic: phase transformation
Replies: 9
Views: 15029

Re: phase transformation

Dear Jane,

I have doubts whether it can work like you want: If you are still in the two-phase region (austenite + ferrite), and ferrite does not grow, how can you get stable martensite then?

Bernd
by Bernd
Fri Oct 14, 2022 2:51 pm
Forum: solidification
Topic: forrtl: error (65): floating invalid when simulation the second phase
Replies: 10
Views: 10279

Re: forrtl: error (65): floating invalid when simulation the second phase

Dear rookie, if you still have trouble with version incompatibility, our recommendation is to use the keyword "diagonal" in the section for definition of stoichiometric phases. This switches to diagonal extrapolation for redistribution (instead of default multi-binary extrapolation) which is general...
by Bernd
Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:27 pm
Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
Topic: phase transformation
Replies: 9
Views: 15029

Re: phase transformation

Dear Jane, Obviously, you are using a "phase switch" by add_to_grain with sub-option "parent_grain" in order to mimic something like a martensite transformation. That is, you are not using normal nucleation, but change the phase of an already existing grain of phase 2. After that, this new grain wit...
by Bernd
Tue Oct 11, 2022 8:36 pm
Forum: solidification
Topic: forrtl: error (65): floating invalid when simulation the second phase
Replies: 10
Views: 10279

Re: forrtl: error (65): floating invalid when simulation the second phase

Dear rookie, Welcome to the MICRESS forum! A segmentation fault normally should not occur even with wrong input data. However it is close to impossible to catch up all types of wrong or inconsistent input, so this could be one possible reason. Another reason could be the incompatibility between ther...
by Bernd
Fri Oct 07, 2022 2:32 pm
Forum: phase-field model
Topic: New publication on SLM
Replies: 0
Views: 78233

New publication on SLM

Dear all,

Our new paper on simulation of additive manufacturing (L-PBF) of the Ni-base-alloy ABD900 is now available online:

Bernd Böttger and Markus Apel
On the choice of thermal boundary conditions for microstructure modelling of additive processes
Procedia CIRP. Volume: 111. 2022

Bernd
by Bernd
Thu Oct 06, 2022 7:53 pm
Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
Topic: element concentrations
Replies: 4
Views: 8152

Re: element concentrations

Dear shaojielv, The most probable reason for the differences is the altered equilibrium temperature: By reducing the amount of alloying elements, the equilibrium temperature is increased, leading to a higher undercooling/driving force and hence to a faster transformation rate. This in turn leads to ...
by Bernd
Thu Oct 06, 2022 12:08 pm
Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
Topic: element concentrations
Replies: 4
Views: 8152

Re: element concentrations

Sorry, shaojielv,

we need more information to answer this question...

Best regards
Bernd
by Bernd
Mon Aug 22, 2022 11:02 pm
Forum: solidification
Topic: Simulation of delta-ferrite/austenite solidifcation sequence under SLM conditions
Replies: 14
Views: 17089

Re: Simulation of delta-ferrite/austenite solidifcation sequence under SLM conditions

Dear Ahmet, I am not sure whether "Morphology Analysis" in DP_MICRESS can help you. It can be used for identifying and counting closed regions of a MICRESS output which are characterized by an interval of the field value (closed isolines). The grain number typically can be taken from .TabK or .TabGD...
by Bernd
Mon Aug 22, 2022 3:38 pm
Forum: MICRESS_training
Topic: MICRESS Advanced Training 2022
Replies: 0
Views: 85037

MICRESS Advanced Training 2022

Dear all, Our first advanced MICRESS Training on simulation of additive processes MICRESS Advanced Training Course for SLM and Additive Manufacturing Application, Autumn 2022 is scheduled for Sept. 13th to Sept. 15th, 2022. We will give profound information on techniques for efficiently simulating a...
by Bernd
Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:45 am
Forum: solidification
Topic: Simulation of delta-ferrite/austenite solidifcation sequence under SLM conditions
Replies: 14
Views: 17089

Re: Simulation of delta-ferrite/austenite solidifcation sequence under SLM conditions

Dear Ahmet, Sorry for my late answer! What you are doing is correct. Using paratq was problematic due to the triple junctions: When using paratq this option must be used for all interfaces, otherwise there is a conflict of non-matching phase compositions. The reason is that paratq uses the Thermo-Ca...