Paraequilibrium in MICRESS

solid-solid phase transformations, influence of stresses and strains
Post Reply
nokkikku
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:07 pm
anti_bot: 333

Paraequilibrium in MICRESS

Post by nokkikku » Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:59 am

Hallo Bernd,

I heard that paraequilibrium (PE) in MICRESS is a 'forced' condition. So the iteration will start without PE and then the element concentration will be forced to change according to the PE condition. Is it right?

So if I run a simulation with PE, would you suggest me to activate the diffusion of all the substitutional solute elements?

Thanks
nokkikku

Bernd
Posts: 1505
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:29 pm

Re: Paraequilibrium in MICRESS

Post by Bernd » Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:33 pm

HI nokkikku,

I am not sure whether I understand what you mean by "forced" condition. PE defines a certain condition for redistribution of (typically) substituional elements in that way that they are not redistibuted and therefore do not reduce the total driving force of the phase tronsformation. The condition is "forced", otherwise it would not be a condition :shock:

The question whether it makes sense to define a finite diffusion for those element is more easy to answer: Normally, as the diffusion length of those elements is very small under PE conditions compared to the interface thickness, diffusion is so slow that it does not have any effect on the phase transformation. In so far, there is no reason to define them, but it would also not hurt (as long as we don't consider performance).
There may exist cases where it nevertheless would make sense to define these diffusion coefficient, like when a subsequent heat treatment is to be simulated or temperature is increased substanitally.

Diffusion and redistribution are two distinct processes in MICRESS: Whether an element is redistributed or not will not change the (mixture) concentration distribution (.concX), as long as there is no diffusion. It will only change the driving-force which depends on the phase compositions (.XPhay)!

Bernd

nokkikku
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:07 pm
anti_bot: 333

Re: Paraequilibrium in MICRESS

Post by nokkikku » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:22 pm

Hi Bernd,

very nice answer. So I will continue the simulation without finite diffusion for PE. I reallised it saves some time.

nokkikku

Post Reply