Dear Bernd,
Thank you so much for your kind help !
We have tried it one more time but the results still seems un-normal. I have sent the in.file to you. Please check it~
Thank you again for your kind help ! We appreciate you so much~
Regards,
Sai Li
how to turn off the Gibbs-Thomson effect
Re: how to turn off the Gibbs-Thomson effect
- Attachments
-
- 1.PNG (64.2 KiB) Viewed 7316 times
Re: how to turn off the Gibbs-Thomson effect
Dear Sai-Li,
I tried to run the .in-file you sent me, using the same Version 6.3 as you did. The result looks like that:
For my understanding, symmetry is ok, not like in your image. That is strange, what do you do differently?
Bernd
I tried to run the .in-file you sent me, using the same Version 6.3 as you did. The result looks like that:
For my understanding, symmetry is ok, not like in your image. That is strange, what do you do differently?
Bernd
Re: how to turn off the Gibbs-Thomson effect
Dear Bernd,
Thank you so much for your kind help !
Our results are similar to you ! Maybe the interface missing at the initial stage is not an important matter. But may I ask why the migration rate of the alpha/gamma interface (middle part) is so slow ? it seems not consistent with the experimental results. Do we need to increase the interface energy ?
Thank you so much for your kind help and hard work ! We appreciate it so much !
Regards,
Sai Li
Thank you so much for your kind help !
Our results are similar to you ! Maybe the interface missing at the initial stage is not an important matter. But may I ask why the migration rate of the alpha/gamma interface (middle part) is so slow ? it seems not consistent with the experimental results. Do we need to increase the interface energy ?
Thank you so much for your kind help and hard work ! We appreciate it so much !
Regards,
Sai Li
Re: how to turn off the Gibbs-Thomson effect
Hi Sai Li,
I do not know how fast it should be. The transformation is limited by carbon diffusion, and I cannot imagine that interface energies have a big influence on the middle part.
What I can imagine, however, is that assuming para-equilibrium instead of nple would speed up the transformation because the driving force is higher.
Bernd
I do not know how fast it should be. The transformation is limited by carbon diffusion, and I cannot imagine that interface energies have a big influence on the middle part.
What I can imagine, however, is that assuming para-equilibrium instead of nple would speed up the transformation because the driving force is higher.
Bernd